The city is currently studying options for how to make Bank Street better, but none of their options seek to push the status quo that got us into the mess we’re in.
With lots of development planned in the surrounding neighbourhoods in the coming years we need to make sure that we’re setting ourselves up for success.
A simple change could make for a much better Bank Street : instead of only having bus lanes for 2 hours in the morning and 2 hours in the evening, let’s have them 24/7! The on-street parking should be moved to the plethora of options available surrounding Bank Street.
On-street parking accounts for only 7% of the overall parking supply. There are over 2000 spots in the studied area, and only 143 of those spots are on-street. The 2nd Avenue Parking Garage has just as many as the whole street!
There are so many benefits that come from this simple change that we’ll get into, while also highlighting the issues of what’s currently in place, as well as the options the city has put forth.
If you’ve been to Bank Street recently, especially during peak hours, you know that it’s probably not a great experience no matter how you decided to get there.
If you’re driving through there’s most likely traffic, if you’re taking the bus you constantly have to pull in and out of the single lane causing delays, if you’re on the sidewalk it’s too narrow, the street is too loud, the intersections are a nightmare, and if you’re a cyclist you’re probably on a different street because Bank is just too dangerous.
Even parking on Bank is not a great experience, as you try to parallel park while 20+ cars pile up behind you waiting for you to pull off the maneuver. During events the area comes to a grinding halt as thousands of people flood into an area with their personal vehicles which are not an efficient way of moving large groups of people.
The source of most of these issues is the on-street parking. It causes much of the traffic on Bank, it takes up 2 full lanes, 6.6m of the 12.6m (over 50%), road. This space could much better serve those moving through, as well as those staying in the area.
Every single car that is pulling into a parking spot causes long backups of traffic while everyone waits for a single car to parallel park into an open spot, bringing the single travel lane down to a grinding halt.
Given that there are so many alternative spots for parking it doesn’t make sense to use all of that valuable space for the storage of personal vehicles.
We support 24/7 bus lanes for Bank Street
Why bus lanes?
- Improved travel time for buses that are often stuck behind single occupancy vehicles, leading to better trust in the transportation system and lower operating costs as a result of less time wasted sitting in traffic
- Improved throughput as bus lanes can carry many more people per hour than car lanes
- Bus lanes can also be used as a bike lane, and reduces “dooring” instances for bikers
- Studies show businesses do better on streets where on-street parking is converted to alternative modes of transportation
- Simpler to understand for users, leading to fewer tickets for drivers (studies show temporary lanes lead to very few improvements for buses as cars are often left parked in their lanes)
- Daylighting allows for better pedestrian and cyclist safety as well as cars that turning onto Bank from perpendicular streets
- Reduction of traffic as more efficient modes of transportation become easier to choose
- Reduction of congestion caused by parallel parking (see videos below)
Where is everyone parking?
Landsdowne Parking Garage
1000+ spots
Glebe Parking Garage
139 spots
Street parking
143 spots
Only accounts for 7% of all parking on Bank Street
Given that there are plenty of underused parking spots available in the surrounding area, it makes sense to move the parking to those other locations to free up such vital space in an extremely important corridor for our city.
Businesses also are not typically benefiting from having a parking spot right in front of their store, as they can typically only fit one car per business. Many businesses will have many more people than that at a time, many studies show businesses over-estimate how many of their customers arrived by car. Given how little on-street parking is available per business it’s also safe to assume that you already are not able to park right in front of the business that you’re visiting with the current on-street parking situation anyways, so not much will change for your average shopper.
Bank is both a very important destination, but also an important road for moving people through it. The bus lanes would help make both of those purposes better, and would help push Bank in a positive direction for people living nearby, commuters passing through, business owners, and every type of transportation mode.
At a time when our ridership numbers are falling due to service cuts we need to take the easy wins that help instill confidence in our system, bus lanes are a simple step in this direction that have been shown time and time again to help improve travel times. This would give people a choice in how they get around their city. They could choose to leave their car at home and take public transit as an option, alleviating congestion from the rest of the people who might still prefer to drive.
What is the City proposing?
Problems With Option A
This option would seek to put even more fast moving vehicle lanes on a street that would be ruined by more car traffic. With lanes where cars can pass each other we will see more speeding, leading to an increase in noise and most importantly danger for everyone using Bank, especially pedestrians. Given that Bank is such a vital location for pedestrians this would lead to a much less pleasant experience. It also wouldn’t solve any traffic issues as we know that more car lanes do not fix our traffic problems, also known as Induced Demand (here is a great short video explaining it).
Problems With Option B
We’ve already mentioned this option previously, but to sum it up, only having bus lanes during small sections of the day leads to confusion, and tickets, for drivers. Many studies also show that temporary bus lanes gain none of the advantage of full-time bus lanes as there are too often cars remaining parked in the lanes, this ends up leading to none of the benefits you’d expect from bus lanes. The option also removes bus lanes during the most important time we’d need them, which is during large Lansdowne events. Public transportation is the only way to move large groups of people to a specific location. Not having a bus lane during those hours will lead to much more congestion during events. By providing good public transportation options you incentivize people to leave their cars at home, and thus help alleviate the need for parking as well.
During off-peak hours we know that the alternative parking options (Lansdowne, 2nd Avenue Garage, nearby streets, etc…) have plenty of capacity to handle parking, so there is no reason to try to turn the lanes back to parking lanes during off-peak hours.
Problems With Option C
Given how little parking is already on-street as is (less than 7% of the total parking) it doesn’t make sense to give up a whole lane in an option just to seek to keep 71 parking spots along a 2km stretch of road. This option also removes bus lanes during Lansdowne events, just like Option B, which is a huge missed opportunity and will lead to more congestion during events. The parking will lead to the same issues we currently see on Bank which leads to lots of long backups and is the primary reason we have so much congestion in the first place. Similar to Option B, having only temporary bus lanes will lead to losing almost all of the benefits we’d expect with dedicated transit lanes as cars will be left in the space during the hours where they aren’t allowed.
Problems With Option D
Cycling lanes wouldn’t be a terrible alternative option to 24/7 bus lanes. Many studies show that businesses see huge improvements when bike lanes are put into the streets those businesses are on. There is still no reason to keep half of the less than 7% on-street parking in this option, this extra space could be used for wider pedestrian facilities and wider bike lanes (1.5m is the bare minimum and doesn’t allow for safe passing), this would lead to a much more pleasant experience on the street for shoppers. Bike lanes would help calm the street, reduce noise, and help protect cyclists, all great improvements! Overall this is one of the less bad options the city has chosen, but given the other options of calmer streets nearby we think that Bank should rather prioritize public transportation as one of our main N-S corridors in the city, especially with the importance of moving large amounts of people to events with public transportation.
In our opinion, the city has presented the public with options that have no ambition.
None of the options are willing to move all of the parking off-street to the alternative options permanently. Trying to fit everything into a narrow road like Bank is what got us into this mess in the first place. Given that there are plenty of alternative parking options, and that we cannot destroy all of the businesses to widen the road, we have to prioritize the most important aspects of the street.
Widening sidewalks to provide a pleasant pedestrian experience would be at the top of the list given how narrow it is and how important this area is for shopping. Acknowledging how important of a N-S road Bank is, 24/7 transit lanes allow for more throughput while prioritizing pedestrian safety by encouraging safer modes of transportation.
Our short term proposal
We are proposing permanent 24/7 bus lanes instead of temporary bus lanes. Temporary lanes lead to confusion and cars being left in the bus lanes when they shouldn’t be, losing the benefits of the bus lane. It also leads to punishing people for making mistakes when signage is not clear.
The 24/7 bus lanes can also be used as a bike lane as there will be times when they are empty, and a moderate speed on a bike can typically stay ahead of a bus that has to stop at most of the spots along the street. This in turn gives us the added benefit of essentially adding a bike lane without having to give up transit dedicated lanes.
Widening sidewalks to provide a pleasant pedestrian experience would be at the top of the list given how narrow it is and how important this area is for shopping. Acknowledging how important of a N-S road Bank is, 24/7 transit lanes allow for more throughput while prioritizing pedestrian safety by encouraging safer modes of transportation.
We believe that perfect is the enemy of good here, and this solution is a quick and effective one. Investment is minimal, and gives us the benefits today while setting us up for the future.
Our long term proposal
In the long term we would love to see the city try to make this area one that people love spending time in. This would include wider sidewalks which would drastically improve pedestrian experience and would allow for patio space.
Wider sidewalks would also allow for more greenspace in an area that is severely lacking it. Greenspace is important for many reasons, road safety, reduced heat, shading, beauty, and so much more. Looking for inspiration from other beautiful pedestrian promenades and shopping districts a grassy-tram would help add greenspace and increase road capacity and safety!
Here’s how you can help!
- Sign this petition which we are using to advocate to the city
- E-mail your thoughts to the project manager, Lise Guevremont, at lise.guevremont@ottawa.ca
- Stay updated on the project here
Resources
Our fact sheet regarding the study and area
Ottawa Citizen Article covering the protest
If you’re interested in planning your own parking day event refer to My Parking Day which has information on how to do so
A study from Queen Street West Parkdale in Toronto that shows merchants over-estimating how many people arrive by car to their shops
They also found visitors that came outside of a car visited more often, and spent more money on a monthly basis
The only people that thought there was inadequate parking in their study was merchants (52%), not shoppers (19%)
A study from Bloor Street in Toronto, which added bike lanes by removing space for cars, that showed again merchants over-estimating how many people drove to their stores
Safety went up after the introduction of bike lanes, more people showed up outside of cars, and only a small uptick in difficulty finding parking spots
This study also found people coming outside of a car came more often, and spent more money, vacancy rates fell in places that introduced bike lanes and businesses did better
A Montreal study that found places with lower levels of parking having fewer vacancies than places that provided more parking
A study from Germany that shows positive impacts on retail when removing on-street parking if there is parking in the surrounding area (which there is in the case of Bank)
They found on-street parking reduced retail rents nearby and that streets with too much motorized traffic and parked cars led to worse experiences and people not wanting to spend time in the area
A study looking at the impact of dedicated bus lanes on traffic showing significant improvements in travel time
Another study using a simulation showing decrease in delays of buses when on-street parking is turned into bus lanes as well as lowered emissions
They also found visitors that came outside of a car visited more often, and spent more money on a monthly basis
The only people that thought there was inadequate parking in their study was merchants (52%), not shoppers (19%)